media literacy...aftermath of ubc class 1

Shirley Steinberg's picture

so, great class…fun, open, informed, and participatory…very cool for a summer class.  it is amazing how much media is in our veins…our students’ veins…our consciousness and formation of our knowledges.  it is hegemonically in the dominant culture’s interest to keep us media illiterate…perhaps that is why media literacy is not on education syllabii, in core curricula, and on our radar.  how different would a critical media curriculum be?  we would not have to alter our content, merely add another lens in which to read media. Freire advocates us to teach our children and youth to read the world–that reading the word is not enough–being functionally literate is still being culturally illiterate.

and so we begin two weeks exploring the effects of media, and critically understanding the multiple meanings in a mediated society.  i am looking out the window at a large Chevron filling station in the middle of the bay…a signifier of corporate consumerism even in the water…that is a symbol i remember from my childhood, laden with red, white, and blue, the gas company remains an american icon–i am interested in your symbols, the symbols of our students…what do these symbols mean?  how do they inform our consciousness?

in the language of Mike Myer’s Linda Richmond….discuss

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The consumerist ethos that dominates our Western culture feels like a beast.  We live in this world of FAKE, because everything is bought on credit.  We are pressured by the stars or by each other to buy fancy cars and Coach purses in order to live up to this ideal lifestyle that is portrayed and then romanticized in the media.  Life is this weird competition of who can accumulate what.  Tabloid magazines are the most incredible form of advertisement out there.  We (quite possibly me, but I think I’m pretty normal) see what the celebrities are wearing- and we want those things.  It is, however, ironic that we want to have what the rich stars have, but then are so judgmental about their ways of life (probably doing things that we all do).  We demonize Christina Agulara for getting a boob job and Lindsay Lohan for drinking too much, but we drool over their Couture dresses?  We idealize what these celebrities have, but condemn them for what they do.  I wonder why this binary- to make us feel better about our credit card bills and our “regular” jobs?

I cannot pretend that I do not fall into this trap.  But it is sort of a survival technique.  If we are to argue that attractiveness is a component of the dominant class, then by default we must assume that we (whoever we is) work to increase our attractiveness. “stuff” is attractive, and if we are culturally literate we will be able to buy the right kind of stuff.  If we see the world through Prada sunglass LENSES then we will at least have the luxury of having social capital as we work to unpack its effects. 
 

The symbol in my childhood memory has always been Mickey and Mini. For me and many other Chinese in my age, the cartoon series was not like any other regular animation, but a 30 minutes date with American Culture once every week. I was easily attracted by the mid-class Mickey and his seductive girlfriend, Mini with long thick eyelashes, because they looked so happy, innocuous, and worriless. Gradually, more and more Mickey and Mini appeared in my life: in my pencil box, on my shirts, on my backpack, etc. They became something must have for many kids in my elementary years. I did not understand what all these mean. I did not know I had unconsciously bought in the American culture sold through cute Mickey and Mini. Until recently, I still dreamed about a Disney Land trip. Honestly, I just realized that what a faithful consumer I could be. Moreover, the cartoon series also planted seeds of American Dream in my heart. Naturally, more and more products associated with American enter into my life, Coke, McDonald's, KFC, Pizza Hut, and so on. I still remember, 4 years ago, I saw hundreds young people lining up in front of a Pizza Hut in China for a Valentine's Dinner. 4 years later, on July 19, 2008, I saw an online news talking about the first customer in the first Apple store in Beijing, China. The 'lucky' Apple customer is a 20 years old college student, who had been waiting 22 hours outside the Apple store until the store opened. Is that another victory of American culture colonialism? At least, it has some symbolic meanings.

While watching my Saturday morning cartoons, I got excited when I saw that the Mickey Mouse Clubhouse show was coming on- Finally I thought! A cartoon that I recognize.  Like Bonnie, I too fondly remember the classic animation which richly portrayed friendship.  So with fond memories of my childhood Mickey in mind, I turned to the Disney channel happy to be consumer of nostalgia.  The first shock came from the harsh colour saturarted, digitalized images of Mickeys new clubhouse- then came the shock of the characters themselves. The greatest change to Mickey et all was the voices- NOT THE SAME! It was like watching the muppets after Jim Henson died- the characters still look and act the same but they don't sound the same which completly emilinates the persona of the character.  Something about the show did not work, it was during the third commercial break in what seemed like 5 minutes did I realize why.  The commecial for the show did not make sense to me the first time I saw it, as there was a picture of a toddler first playing on the computer and then the characters jumped to the TV. The TV show was based on a computer game for children, which explained why there would be "interactive moments" when Mickey would direct a question at "you" and then validated your response with a high pitched, helium enduced "Yes! Good for you".  The computer game is sold at Toys R Us, is available on line and the interactive toys are also sold at both locations. This combination of media literacies was a little surprising to me, since the target audience was 2-5 year olds.  Mickeys image is now one of sales, not memories and dreams-

Personally the timing of this class couldn't have been any better for me. I just finished a class where I learned more about the evil mouse ruled empire, that shall remain nameless, than I ever had thought possible and had my visions of entertainment shattered. Even though I am starting to find myself growing more aware of the influences of media on our daily lives, I was startled by the brand name activity in class. I would love to try a similar activity with a class because if it so easy to be caught off guard by being asked what labels you’re wearing, then the learning opportunities are huge.

From what I have heard and read today, it seems as though the current discourse around media is identifying it as the real life curriculum, not the hidden curriculum. Meaning, students are spending more time engrossed in the media than they are in curriculum subjects so why continue to minimize the vast impact by calling it hidden. Prof. Steinberg’s comment about seeing the red white and blue Chevron reminded me of a documentary I had seen on the power of advertising on children. A class of American grade 5 students were assigned two tasks, one was to think of and draw a corporate symbol to represent each letter of the alphabet (Chevron = C). The second portion was to hand write the cursive alphabet. Nearly the entire class was able to individually identify, draw and label a logo for letters A-Z, and less than half could hand write the letters.

 

I guess I could write a whole lot about symbols, but I’ll just check some. I won't go through the big American corporate ones, because they came later in my conscious life.

Let’s start by white, blue and red…honestly the very first thing that comes to my mind is the Chilean flag. Well, I’m Chilean what did anyone expect? Actually, I’ve just recently realized that the American flag sported the same colors, not that I’m color blind, it is just that for me white, blue and red bear the significance I was taught at school. The white is for our snowy mountains, the blue symbolizes the color of the sky — not any more, Santiago has one of the most polluted skies in the world, at least we get to be number one in something, right? — and the red stands for the blood our heroes bled in order to reach independence. How could I ever relate them to the U.S.??? It’s weird…I feel more Chilean now that I am here. Let’s do another one, the cross. I grew up Catholic– talking about big corporations — and although I have many fights with the Catholic-Church-hierarchies and dogmas I still find it hard to say I’m anything but Catholic. What does the cross represent to me? A reminder that Jesus Christ saved me, a reminder that I am in fact a believer, a reminder that I can be a better person, and that I must love others as I love myself. Actually the cross represents a myriad of things and I could write a lot about it but I don’t want to bore anyone. A third one, a blue owl with a red U on the chest, the symbol of the soccer team I cheer for in Chile, source of happiness and distress. My wedding ring, it reminds me I got married almost 14 years ago to my boyfriend of 8 years, the father of my sweet princesses, my shelter, my lover, my friend, my partner…not my other half, I am a whole person by myself, but the one that has been beside me through rough and smooth, for better or worse…my first pancake – in the words of Dr. Steinberg — and hopefully the last. If I think of my kids, thanks God my 2 year-old can’t tell what the golden arches are all about, but her pacifier, even the sight of it, is huge on calming her down.

Now that I’m somewhat more aware of them…there are hundreds of symbols, and they do inform not only our consciousness but our unconsciousness as well. They make us react, they fill us up with emotions…I can’t avoid feeling anguish and distress when I see a pointy white hood or a swastika. They are “just” symbols, but they carry history and intention. Most symbols have been carefully tailored to meet people’s needs, fears and desires, and they do the job quite brilliantly.

Vanessa Paradis's picture

Pamela,

I was doing some research and just happened to come across something related to your post about the cross and what it represents (which I had read earlier). I found this a fascinating presentation of  liberation theology....let me know what you think. Does it represent how you have viewed these symbols (which I would be interested in learning more about!) - or is this new? For me it was totally new and expands how I view Jesus in relation to the violence of oppression.

http://www.alastairmcintosh.com/general/1992-stations-cross-esquivel.pdf (There is also has a powerpoint version, but I found the pdf fine for viewing).

In solidarity,

Vanessa

Vanessa,

As a Catholic who participates of the rituals on a regular basis I was familiar wit the Stations of the Cross, but I had never seen the presentation you posted. It's incredible!!! so grounded in Latin American reality. Thanks a lot for this piece, I will use it with my students as soon as I have the chance.  There are so many ways to bring Jesus to our current lives, to make His teachings meaningful nowadays, this is another another one, and I thank you for it.

Pam

Vanessa Paradis's picture

Pam,

I'm happy you enjoyed Esquivel's art. I too thought it was brilliant artwork and dialogue, and expanding how we think about these symbols in the important context of social justice and solidarity instills a sense of hope that is so empowering. Kincheloe writes in regards to the study of "symbol systems and cultural signs," "semiotics helps equip individuals with a new critical consciousness - a way of seeing that empower men and women to move beyond the beliefs that have been shaped by domination and moral regulation" (para. 5).  This adds a whole new dimension I was unaware of... it makes me wonder how many more ways my mind has been shut off, boxed in, and manipulated.

In Solidarity,
Vanessa

References

Kincheloe, J. Critical theory and the moral dimension: Emancipation, complexity, and power. (Avaliable in the Freire Project Reading Room).

I agree, great class! I especially appreciated the time spent reminiscing about our childhood media memories –  existing in the tension created where nostalgia intersects with critical consciousness. Barbie was one image I carried with me as I walked to the beach this afternoon to do my reading and to reflect on the influence of media symbols on myself, my community, and my students. Whenever I think about Barbie though, GI Joe’s army fatigues inevitably pop up – for it seemed to be one or the other when I was growing up; either you’ve got the prettiest outfit & accessories, or else you’re tough enough to blow the competition to smithereens. Ever notice how, amid the myriad fashion trends over the years, camouflage has never quite gone out of style?

Speaking of symbols, I am currently looking at rich array on the Canadian Forces website (www.forces.ca - if you visit, be sure not to miss out on the TV ad which encourages enlisting in order to “FIGHT FEAR” and “FIGHT CHAOS” among other grand adventures). The whole website is rife with patriotic images, and caters most especially to marginalized peoples including visible minorities (which include “Black, Chinese and Japanese Canadians”), women, and Aboriginal peoples. All of these blurbs predictably espouse the duty and honour of serving in the Canadian military. In the case of visible minorities, for example, the website claims that to have earned the right to fight for the country meant success in the struggle against discrimination. And maybe on some level it was a success; certainly the Canadian Forces do offer some fantastic career opportunities and “free” education, if you’re willing to be inspected, scrutinized, and ordered around a whole lot. In effect, if you’re willing to play the game, you may reep the rewards… actually, it’s a very fitting ‘factory-style’ exercise for a  capitalist country’s defense strategy.

But I am not just interested because of my childhood nightmare of the limited, and highly gendered playground choices of GI Joes or Barbies. I spent the early years of my teaching career teaching in Northern Quebec on a Naskapi reserve. The community was isolated from the educational opportunities of the rest of the province and the school had no guidance counselor to assist graduates in making decisions about their future directions, be those to CEGEP (college), university, trades, or community programmes. These kids certainly didn’t have the University recruitment reps signing up to make presentations to students (the way they did at my high school). One organization, however, figured the 3- hour flight in a nine-seater to the small sub-arctic community was worth it. The Canadian Forces flew all the way to the tree line to talk to my students about specialized Aboriginal programming (during class time, of course). Glossy brochures, exciting videos, and promise of free travel & thousands of dollars remuneration for a few weeks of pre-recruitment training was more than enough for many to fill out applications. (Completely understandable, given the options presented -- too bad Dawson college or Sabtuan Regional Vocational Training Centre couldn’t also have made the trip). But I wondered, whose interests are being served by upping the number of Aboriginal soldiers in Canada’s military anyway?

A browse through the very separate and elaborate Aboriginal programmes website (http://www.forces.ca/interactive/cfaep/index.asp) reveals that according to Canadian Forces, Aboriginal peoples have a “proud tradition” of serving for Canada in several international conflicts. And further, that recruitment programmes are aiming to match the number of Aborignal, Metis & Inuit soldiers proportionally to Canada’s population demographics. The images of soldiers growing out of the ground and canoes morphing into submarines all to the tune of wolves howling suggests something a lot more insidious, however. But not to worry, the Canadian Forces does make “cultural accommodations” for First Peoples: “Aboriginal members of the CF can wear their hair long or braided.”  

But is the military a big, nasty, horrible beast? No, I do not seek to condemn the career choices of many, including Aboriginal peoples. In fact, a former student of mine joined because she liked to be physically active, and as non-heterosexual young woman, could not find acceptance in her conservative Christian (a lasting gift of early missionaries) community. For her, the programme was a way out, and on top of that is has afforded many opportunities she may otherwise not have had. I do however question the values propagated by the Canadian Military tradition, it’s motives vis-à-vis Aboriginal youth, and its recruitment strategy. Indeed, whose interests are being served by encouraging the Canadian government’s strongest resisters to join a Nationalist organization?

Politics at it’s best

R. Sweeney

July 21, 2008

 

Power and knowledge, how are they really measured?  I was at a McDonalds (yes I feel guilty but that is not the point) last week and was standing in line.  A man in front of me that some may say was a “bum” was next in line.  He was very well mannered as any guest would be.  When the man stepped up to the counter he was waited on by what seemed to me to be the manager.  He was well groomed, wearing a different uniform than the other workers and seemed to me that he could hear and actively communicate.  As I was waiting I listened to the interactions of the manager and the “bum”.  The man ordered a muffin and placed his change on the counter.  As he paid for the muffin he asked the manager if he could have a fresh muffin as the other worker had just brought them out and they were sitting on the counter.  The manager took the money and gave the man his change.  The manager proceeded to the muffins taking one of the old muffins, putting it in a bag and placed it in the microwave.  At this time the man asked again if he could have had one of the fresh muffins and the manager again stared right at him and completely ignored him.  As the man asked for the new muffin the second time he wasn’t only ignored by the manager but then he was harassed by the other worker questioning him about being around the new muffins and that he had touched them.  I couldn’t believe what I had seen.  I am usually a very vocal person when I feel someone was being taken advantage of, but I didn’t do anything.  I don’t know if it was shock or if I didn’t want to make the man feel even more invisible than he most likely already did.  As I left the McDonalds I felt really distraught.  Had that man been you or me he would have got one of the new muffins.  Had he looked, or perceived to be a well groomed, clean cut, knowledgeable person, he would have been served differently.  Since McDonalds or the manager didn’t see him as a threat, or anyone who they may be able to profit from, he was treated very badly.  Politics at it’s best.        

 

I think flags are interesting symbols . When I see the Canadian flag, I feel lucky to live in Canada. I see the Maple Leaf and think about the Canadian environment, vast and varied. I think about a friendly, multicultural country. And then the American flag enters my head. Like a migraine. Or maybe like an errant bullet from south of the border. I associate that flag with power, money, arrogance…and a bit of nausea, because I’m worried that Canada isn’t that different than our neighbours.

 
I did a quick youtube search and found 1810 hits for “Canadian Flag” and 4030 hits for “American flag”. I was surprised that there were so few American flag hits, as I associate the American flag as a significant source of American pride and dominance, so I thought there would be millions of videos celebrating the Stars and Stripes. It was interesting that few Canadian flag videos appeared negative or controversial, but there were a significant number of American flag videos focusing on war, politics or flag burning.
 
What about the Olympic flag? Does it represent the connectedness of the five continents? It was interesting to live in Vancouver when the 2010 Olympic bid was being debated. Concern over the road to Whistler got more attention in the media than impacts on people living in the Downtown Eastside. Talk of jobs, new facilities, and tourism didn’t really get into details like who would actually make the “profit”.
 
I sound too negative right now. Don’t worry; I’m not ready to raise the white flag yet.

 

“Class”

R. Sweeney (blog2)

July 22, 2008

 

I found this class to be very interesting.  The time just seemed to fly bye.  It was great to see from the video today some old tv shows that I totally am guilty of watching.  The video was really eye opening.  When I was little I watched these shows purely for entertainment purposes.  I never even thought of thinking of them in any other way.  I didn’t think it was odd to see a black successful family playing the characters of the Cosby Show, that’s just who they were.  A black lawyer and a black doctor married with kids, that’s a normal family right? 

 

I thought it was funny when the video talked about the lower (so to speak) class and the upper class meeting, showing ‘the Nanny” borrowing something from a group of well dressed snobby women sitting around a table.  “The Nanny” coming through the bushes like she is some kind of animal as well as the women passing her the item with out even looking at her really painted a picture of a class hierarchy.   

 

Two points that were discussed in class today were invasion and ethnic.  Points were raised that in society today an invasion refers to anyone or any immigrant who is not white.  That society is ok, or accepting of immigrants who are white, but look out if you have a color to your skin.  Another point I thought worth mentioning was the term ethnic.  The point made that ethnic is considered anyone except white people is really racist.  That fact brought up today that we even have a section in the grocery store for ethnic food, and in other department stores for hair products etc., was really demeaning of us as a community or society.  Talk about segregation.            

 

I was talking today with someone who is not a teacher but considering getting her Masters in Education. She expressed how she can’t believe that media literacy is not part of the school curriculum (even though I hadn’t even mentioned the subject). I completely agree with that view. We try to teach children to be critical thinkers and to connect what they learn in the classroom to the real world, but there is something wrong when we fail to teach them how to think critically about the real world.
We are flooded daily with symbols that most of us do not even consciously think about we are seeing. Many of us, especially children, are conformists. When I was a child, I wanted to buy the ‘name brands’ because wearing trendy logos was the way to be/feel accepted. I never questioned what the brand stood for or what it took to make it. It makes me think of a commercial where they use the term ‘brand power’ – buy the brands that are popular/well known because they are of good quality. That is how most consumers identify with brands, whether it be clothing, food or electronics. If it’s a popular brand, it must be a respectable product and everyone wants to be respected and fit in, so they go with what’s ‘in’. A symbol is a powerful tool, whether we like to admit it or not. A great example of this is the symbol used by Apple. When I brought my Macbook to school, many of my students (grade 3) were thrilled to see it on my desk. They started asking me if it belonged to me and if I had an Ipod. Then many of them started sharing, with great pride, how their dad had an Apple computer or an Ipod. The Apple symbol to them was not simply that of a computer company, but rather a status symbol. It’s funny how only a few years ago Apple was seen as an inferior product, but with smart advertisement, it has transformed into pop culture.

I agree with you, another interesting class seemed to fly by today as we were involved in some “enlightening” discussions, making personal connections to a variety of situations, and viewing the DVD that summed-up chapter 5 in ML (Critical Media Literacy for the Twenty-First Century). Re-watching the clips from so many of the past TV series brought back all sorts of good memories as well for me. I agree with you in that at the time watching them was purely for entertainment purposes and I didn’t recall back then there being a “hidden” agenda or “another purpose” behind the show(s). An interesting point was made in the DVD “Class Dismissed” ….  the Archie Bunker series and the purpose behind the series and the characters. I believe Pepi Leistyna stated in the film that the Bunkers were purposely portrayed as a lower working class family in order to make the general audience feel better about themselves… that whole hierarchical classification system that society likes to put into place. Is that the reason my “middle class” family laughed and look forward to “ a night with the Bunker family”? Hmmmmmm. It makes me feel a bit uneasy thinking that I was “roped-in” by the producers of the show.
Your comments about the two points raised in class today regarding invasion and ethnic brought home all sorts of personal connections. Since my 17 years of teaching in Richmond I have noticed more and more the use and abuse of the word “invasion” (of the Asians) especially in the school populations commented by “white” community members and surprisingly enough… teaching staff. Note to self … be careful and cautious of the use and misuse of the word “ethnic” as I tend to like to wander down the “multi-cultural” food isles at Super Store and specialty stores. Another hmmmmm. This class certainly offered a variety of “food for thought”.
 

The Class Dismissed DVD was as Robyn said, very interesting and eye opening. As an adult I think I question the portrayals in TV less than when I did when I was younger because I see it as entertainment. When I was growing up I knew that my family situation was not "normal", so when I was able to watch TV I was envious of the stability of the families portrayed on the shows like the Cosbys, Cleavers and even the Ricardos.  What really intriqued me about the video was the issue of queerness and class as portrayed in the Will and Grace.  Having not seen a complete episode before, I went home and watched one- WOW- So obvious! The portrayal of the maid was a surprise, for she is degraded because of her immigrant status by her white employer but is alos portrayed as being smarter than her.

From the readings I was fascinated with the classification system for the vocabulary used to 'guide' the "herd", it made me reflect on all the newspaper headlines I have read and the news broadcast I have seen- so blantant!  I have the feeling that I may end up being rather irrate myself for being so naive for so long- the more you know, the more you realize you don't know. Ooh look another episode of Will and Grace is on... 

 

Symbols such as the golden arches of Macdonald’s, and the green mermaid of Starbucks, inform us that these establishments offer the promise of product satisfaction, whereas “no-name” restaurants and cafes carry a great deal of uncertainty and risk for the consumer.  Therefore, the Macdonald’s and Starbucks symbols create in our conscious a sense of comfort and ease because they represent consumer certainty and familiarity.  The comfort and ease that accompanies such symbols is built into our consciousness through our own personal experiences.  Over time we develop a certain relationship with the Macdonald’s and Starbucks of the world, one that is built on the promise that each visit to these establishments will provide us with the same product consistency and quality every time. Even though each franchise store is somewhat different from the others, we still allow ourselves to belief the promise that the symbol on the outside of the building makes.  Therefore, we overlook the flaws of the individual store because we are convinced that simply because it bares the Macdonald’s arches it must produce the same quality of product we enjoyed at the last store we visited.  Consumers, however, must be continually satisfied with the products they purchase from these symbolic restaurants/cafes or they will begin to be disillusioned with the promises of their symbols.  In other words, if Macdonald’s products continually disappoint you then eventually you will view the golden arches as a symbol of distasteful food, rather than a delicious meal, and stop believing the promise of the symbol.
 

Symbols such as the blue and white circle of the BMW auto corporation also inform our consciousness.  BMW cars are marketed as the “Ultimate Driving Machines” and the blue and white symbols are the stamp of approval on each car, the verification that you are actually driving or witnessing the “Ultimate Driving Machine.”  Without the blue and white symbol BMW cars would be hard to distinguish from other brands and perhaps only the most ardent automobile enthusiasts would recognize a BMW not displaying its trademark symbol.  The BMW symbol is what people look for when they are trying to assess which automobile is the best.  Of course other auto makers, Mercedes for instance, have become equal or greater to BMW, but BMW still gives the consumer the promise of being at the same level as the other luxury cars.  This is do to the fact that the BMW symbol has long stood for excellence in automobile engineering and still claims to be the best of the best, the “Ultimate Driving Machine”.  Now, as we commute to work, and we are passed by thousands of cars daily, we can categorize cars by simply looking at the symbols they bare on the front and rear ends.  Cars that have the BMW symbol are placed at the highest category, whether we’ve driven one or not, because our consciousness has been told that this blue and white symbol means that this car is a BMW, and therefore, one of the best cars humankind has ever created

 

 

July 21/08

Thinking about our discussions today and curious to know what my 15 year old daughter and her 15 year old friend think -- I asked them who has the power in our society?   They were quick to answer; "Celebrities, because they just need to do something, say something, wear stuff, etc. and it becomes popular, then all the cheap stores want to copy them and sell it to us."  

I asked; "What if designers give them free stuff, or their managers restrict their image freedom and make them dress/look a certain way -- who is in control then?"  They still think celebrities are in control of themselves and while they agree that designers are using celebs as "free" models, they think it's kind of like the chicken and the egg thing -- who had the 'fashion/style' first, the designer or the celebrity.  Hmmm.  They vehemently believe that celebrities have far more 'control' over their own images than I believe they do and so I suspect I will embark on an eye-opening journey with my daughter over the next little while, more so than ever.  They found the question of “who has power” hard to answer, as they took it to mean political power, but when talking about the power of media and images they did talk a lot about the overrepresentation of anorexic white girls and even quoted stats – “Did you know that 15-20% of young girls have eating disorders.” When I asked what religious views are represented, they barely missed a heartbeat and answered in unison “Christianity” (neither of them believe in God).  "Ya, like even rappers thank God for making them famous."  When I asked them about talk shows, they both said they loved Ellen and David Letterman, but hated the Tyra Banks show because it’s “really boring, all about make-up and how to lose weight”.  They like Ellen because “she’s funny and really interesting and has interesting topics and funny skits and stuff and David Letterman because he interviews celebrities and has music on the show.”  I wonder what 3 shows I’ll be watching…?  Their guilty media pleasure is Camp Rock with the Jonas Brothers (a Disney product). Who knew? 

 

Dorothy Says:
 

It was a very interesting first class. My first thought is that I would like to putting together a class visual dictionary of symbols/icons that most of my grade 6/7 know. There is no doubt that the lexicon of images is extensive–even if created by 12 and 13 year old children. Throughout the years, I have asked the students to identify famous pieces of art. Although they may not know the artist or the name of the piece, they are familar with many images. Several students can identify Munch’s The Scream or a Picasso piece from his cubist period. I soon realized this was not due to great art education, at home or at school. This types of images have been coopted by corporations in order to increase sales. I was deflated–much as I was when Michael Jackson bought much of the Beatles catalogue. I’m not sure selling running shoes was what Lennon, at least, was thinking when he wrote Revolution. More upsetting, sometimes I find myself humming along to a great song when I realize it is now just soundtrack to a commercial.


Part of my particular educational interest is the use of SMARTBoard’s (interactive whiteboard) and the way they seem to empower children with disabilties. It would be a great vehicle for a media literacy project where we could have our own visual journal of images that convey meaning with no words. With the exception of health and safety warnings, off the top of my head the ones that I can think of all relate to companies, products or services. As mentioned in class, this type of knowledge is a different literacy yet extremely powerful. The concept of a shorthand that identifies a brand is the cheapest and possibly most powerful type of advertising. It does have ramifications for education. How much money should be spent on education?if all children really need is knowledge enough to get a paycheck and identify the swoosh, the arches, and the DC in order to spend their money? It always returns to the ultimate purpose of education. In other classes, we have agreed to the aim of education to be to help children ultimately “lead a good and worthwhile life in a democratic society” then the curriculum leaves out much of the information required to be more than a member of “the bewildered herd.”

 

According to CBC journalist Duncan McCue “Both the media and the trickster figure (whether it be Raven, Coyote or Nanabush) in Aboriginal cultures thrive on conflict and tension.” I couldn’t help but think that I also must have a bit of a trickster character in me too. Of course my conflict and tension will not arise until tomorrow morning when my alarm clock painfully wakes me up, providing me a gentle reminder that I need to finish my readings for tomorrow mornings class.
 
But how could I resist attending the Indigenous Free Skool’s weekly gathering? This week’s class seemed particularly relevant to critical media literacy. Titled “Getting the Word Out”, we were taught by Duncan McCue, how to write an Indigenous message for mainstream and indy media. As a national reporter for CBC-TV News in Vancouver, Duncan shared his experience as journalist with our group and gave us some pointers on how to make Aboriginal news stories meaningful to the mainstream public. He said a couple of things that made me think (yes even at this late hour).
 
1. Topics and stories that are important to Aboriginal people are not always important to newsmakers.
 
2. We need to ensure that our stories and submissions to the media somehow affect the newsmakers in order to have our stories heard.
 
I am left to wonder how do we (and other minority groups in Canada) make our stories important enough to be heard? If we spin our stories to fit within a dominant construction that does not reflect our world view are we being co-opted? How do we change how we are represented? Are we manipulating the media to the best of our advantage? How do we use the media as a form of empowerment? What are the advantages to using alter-Native forms of media and technology? 
 
A little background on the Indigenous Free Skool (IFS). The Indigenous Peoples Free Skool was started by a group of Indigenous youth, students, activists and teachers in 2007 who were interested in building upon free skool philosophy from Indigenous perspectives. A free skool is a space in which skills, information, and knowledge are shared without hierarchy or the institutional environment found in formal education. The open structure of a free skool is intended to encourage self reliance, critical consciousness, and personal development. It is, at is heart, non-institutional, and non-authoritarian. The first two classes of the month (one class a week) are dedicated to learning and the last two weeks are allocated for action (be it writing, hip hop, action, or others topics chosen). There is a different facilitator/teacher for each of the four classes within a month. The month of July’s classes focused on “What does it mean to be celebrating 150 years of B.C. as a Crown Colony. The month of August will look at food sovereignty issues. (I love the concept of the skool!).
 
Raven and I are signing off, so we can dream up some more counter-hegemonic stories.
 

 

 

As I was reading the Media Literacy: A reader, Wag the Dog somehow comes to mind. Wag the Dog is a 1997 film starring Robert DeNiro, about the White House using media to fabricate a fake war with Albania to distract the electorate from a U.S. presidential sex scandal. I remembered when this film was released, so was the Bill Clinton-Monica Lewinsky scandal surfaced onto headlines. Coincident? It was life imitating art or the other way around…hmmm. I don’t know. But for some reason, I was stunned by how media can be used to manipulate the publics and how the publics are so easily taken in by it.  Media in different forms have always been tools to propagandas and ideological control yet this movie really puts it in my face. I supposed this was when I became media literate – “The eyes do not see; they only record while the mind sees.” Entertainment is more than just entertainment now. Like Donaldo Macedo puts it “that the mind can be ideologically controlled, it filters in order to transform what the eyes record.”  

The Gods Must Be Crazy was another film that comes to mind. This is a movie about an African Bushmen, living in the deep isolation of the Kalahari dessert, saw a Coke Cola bottle dropped from the sky and went on a journey to the edge of the Earth to return the bottle to God. When I first saw this movie back when I was still a kid, I just thought it was funny. But really, Coke Cola was at the forefront of marketing, not just a short cameo in a movie branding its product, but a whole movie centered around a Coke Cola bottle – the ultimate product placement! What an ingenious way of marketing a product – a movie and a commercial all in one. Is this media democracy or media hypocracy? I can’t but feel betrayed by what is supposed to be pure entertainment which really is not, but a movie with implicit agenda of selling more Coke….and now, there is the Happy Factory – have coke and be happy (no pun intended).     

 

 

After yesterday's class I thought about our discussion around the notion of a disappearing middle class. Perhaps the middle class is not necessarily disappearing but we are living beyond our means...our maxed out credit cards, the desire to look and feel like movie stars...in a wrinkle free world holding a prada purse working at starbucks!     We are striving for something the media wants us to be...The media speaks for us, represents us, speaks to us and even advises us (choose this name brand over the leading name brand because....).  The media targets the dominant middle class culture, the more we buy, the more we feel like we’ve moved up in this world! It’s not enough to be media aware, but media literate...who’s being represented? Why? Whose voice is being heard? What’s being kept from the viewer, subscriber, or consumer?...questions for “Culture Jamming” with students.
Symbols...hmmm...they remind me of my grade 6/7 female students who are obsessed with lululemon and TNA.   Children are not children in this media world, but “revolving” consumers. Wearing symbols, but not sure what they stand for is common... children are very aware of symbols and they place great value on them. According to my high school teacher friend here is a disturbing media symbol .... playboy bunny tanning sticker placed on a teenage girl’s body-they wear the sticker, go to the tanning booth and then remove the sticker-being branded exemplifies that we somehow have digested media and it owns us-what’s this all about?

 

 

I have been thinking about the students that I taught this past school year.  They were 7 and 8 years old while in grade 2, yet already they were very strongly influenced by their exposure to media.  Some of them asked their parents to buy them “happy meals” from McDonalds.  When I ask the students why they like McDonald’s so much, they explained that they like getting the toys from McDonalds.  They had not yet realized why McDonalds was giving them those toys along with their hamburger, fries and pop.  They also discussed “Hannah Montana.”  One seven year old student even missed an afternoon of school so her dad could drive her to Seattle for a “Hannah Montana” concert.  Webkinz, stuffed animals that “come alive” online in a “Webkinz World” and various PlayStation and XBox games are also hot topics for discussion among grade 2 students.  There were a couple of grade 2 students who already had a cell phone and at least one student received an iPod as a gift.  This student thought I was a bit strange for not having an iPod, after all, doesn’t everyone need one? 

At recess time there is a forested area where students can build forts, other areas for playing soccer, hockey, or various playground games and creative activities.  While these activities do occur, a lot of girls in my grade 2 class preferred to bring “Bratz” dolls and ponies and all the various accompanying accessories to school.

 While painting self portraits in class, a number of students included detailed replications of the logos or phrases from their clothing.  A few of the girls drew themselves wearing clothing that they see pictured with the “Bratz” dolls (e.g., short shirts, jewelry, high-heeled shoes) or drew themselves standing in a model-like pose. 

 

 

While the students are strongly influenced by media, most of them have not yet developed media literacy.   It will be crucial for them to be more aware of what is really going on in the world of media and how their consciousness and knowledge formation is already being manipulated by various forms of media at a young age. 

 

After watching the film today...I wonder, why isn’t reality depicted in media? We must be in denial, or there is a hidden agenda to guide us to more social inequity...if we don’t depict racial discrimination, social and cultural inequalities, class divisions in media, then, what are we saying about our world? I guess the difficulty lies in who should the media represent and who gets to choose. Or, maybe the media really does depict our reality or our confusion well. It depicts our desire to move out of the world we live in (escapism of our existence), and into a “hyper” or false reality.
Television has promoted assimilation-coming from an immigrant family what I saw is what I wanted in order to “fit-in.” How are school any different? I know it’s a jaded look on education, but there is definitely an element of assimilating in our system. I like the comment that someone made earlier about an aim of education is help children “lead a good and worthwhile life in a democratic society” but the curriculum leaves out much of the information required to be more than a member of “the bewildered herd.” We want to promote diversity and democracy, but we continue to fall in the trap of hierarchy and power relations. How do we get out of this trap? Or do we want to?

 

I agree that schools work (or like to think we work) to promote diversity and democracy for and with our students- but the nature of our system is contrary to this mandate.  We teach democracy under the oppressive cape of public education, where this system of rigid meritocracy perpetuates the dominant class and dominate values. Educators try to value or celebrate diversity, but so often those attempts are superficial.  We pat ourselves on the back when we hold a potlatch or a multicultural day, but instead of valuing different cultures and addressing social injustice, we tokenize.

Diversity becomes “othered” when we reward White middle class ways of success.  We value and reward with marks, among other things, time lines, compliance, and polite discourse.  Other cultures who do not have the cultural capital to effectively participate in these social nuances will have less success in the system. 
   

The idea that schools are this great equalizer to social inequities is a fraud.  We pretend schools are this neutral territory and as a consequence pluralism is shunned and social inequities will be continually perpetuated. 
 

I enjoy the feeling of dis/location, of hearing another voice and feeling that stirring inside me that denotes ‘movement’. Sounds like constipation…well, it kind of is…a social constipation. When one allows oneself to sit, unmoved for too long and then a voice comes along and forces you to move. Discourse can be like exlax. Enough of that…

Reflecting on the comment above that “Freire advocates us to teach our children and youth to read the world–that reading the word is not enough–being functionally literate is still being culturally illiterate”, I think a good place to start is to show students that they already read the world; and that their reading is informed by who they are, and the priviledges the may or may not hold. I teach grade 6/7 and I love the passion of my students’ assumptions. Their reaction to ‘Otherness’ is beautiful. My favourite way to start a lesson is “Ok, I’m not really supposed to talk about this, but…” It grabs their attention. They want to see more than they currently can, or are premitted to. They want to be involved in the construction of knowledge.

 My partner laughed when I told him about the course. He said it is the perfect course for me. I think this comment might come from the fact that he often wonders why I watch television when most of it just makes me ‘upset’ to the point where I yell at the screen. I like to think of it as ‘interactive media’. Besides burying our heads in the sand doesn’t make it go away…we just get dirt in our eyes.

 

As long as we’re talking amongst ourselves (in the language of Linda Richmond)... I remember growing up in the 60’s with KRAFT Singles, Miniature-Marshmallows, Pizzas, KD, Velveeta Cheese, Cheese-Whiz…it seemed like if it wasn’t KRAFT, it wasn’t food. Sunday night wasn’t a Sunday on CBC without the voice of Bruce Marsh intoning in a rich voice… “Hi I’m Bruce Marsh with tonight’s KRAFT recipe”…invariably, the recipe contained KRAFT Miniature Marshmallows or Miracle Whip and sometimes both if you can imagine (both well known health foods!) Even today the slogan is “it’s gotta be KD”. This resulted no doubt in the unification of  “American Cuisine” where you gave-up or lost homemade products and a complex variety of foods derived from a multiplicity of ethnic origins – Slavic, Italian, Greek, Middle Eastern. Who was going to eat Mom’s pizza when you could make a KRAFT pizza in 20 minutes? And so we lost contact with many cultural foods (although now we seem to be gaining them back). The net effect of all this brainwashing is that I now avoid all KRAFT products although I might be buying KRAFT products unwittingly (perhaps hidden by another label). KRAFT just like Chevron with its red, white and blue lettering is the second largest North American food and beverage company). Note also that James L. Kraft was a Canadian!!  Thinking about all this makes me feel just a little “verklempt”! I’ll just leave you with this thought… Kraft dinner is neither a craft nor a dinner. Discuss.  

The effect that the media has on kids with food is extremely frustrating to parents and teachers. Kids constantly see ads for the "cool" foods (read: processed), that are aired specifically during programs that they like to watch. Then at lunch time the show and tell commences - those who have these foods buy themselves cultural capital, and those who don't will likely have a lower social status with their classmates. Parents may be against buying processed foods, however, when faced with temper tantrums and pleading in the grocery stores, many cave in. For teachers, it is frustrating to deal with the after-effects of processed/ sugary foods as they make kids hyper-active and irritable. The government has attempted to get all junk food out of schools, however, as somebody mentioned in an earlier class, this is pushing kids out of school to the convenience stores to get their junk. Junk food will always be promoted over “real food” as long as advertising has control over the media, as the junk food companies have all the money. The recent surge in popularity of celebrity chefs such as Jamie Oliver and Gordon Ramsey have helped to stir up more interest in cooking and food in general – one positive aspect of the media. Jamie Oliver was especially successful in England with his goal to improve the school cafeteria lunches which had always been renowned for being terrible – in fact my dad (he grew up in England), used to tell us about how he would stuff his school lunch in his pockets every day. Kids’ taste in food eventually improves, however, parents and teachers can help them become aware that they are being duped by the junk food companies by such ploys as associating foods with movies and placing sugary cereals at kid-level in the grocery stores.

Watching the clips from televison shows of the 70s, 80s and 90s, I realize how much television I watched in my childhood. Even though we were pretty poor, we always had a tv and cable. I remember having little time for cartoons, but graviting towards shows like All In The Family, Maude, Good Times, Mary Tyler Moore, etc. I own some of these on dvd because they have a certain comfort for me.

Another thing that came to mind for me is how much I resented shows like Will and Grace and Queer Eye for the Straight Guy. When they first came out (no pun intended...well, maybe a little), I remember the eagerness to see any queer representation on the screen. But soon two things happened: 1. I lost interest in the superficial representations, and 2. I got so tired of people at work constantly referencing these shows in our conversations. It was like they thought they had a better understanding of who I was by watching these shows; or that by invoking them, they were showing me that they were 'liberal' people.

As for the readings...George Bush, and the people around him, scare me.

My girlfriend has a guilty pleasure that she likes to do in public and this morning, I got to watch. 

I was looking over her shoulder as she was shamefully reading the free “24 Hour” newspaper. I thought about Edward S. Herman’s dossier of word tricks when I saw a couple of articles about the Olympics, which happened to be one of the topics in my last blog.
The first article: “Violent protests rattles city…an escalating campaign by anonymous anti-Olympic vandals…” Escalating campaign sounds more like George W. in Iraq than some spray paint on a Welcome to Vancouver sign. The article quotes a SFU professor “There are people that are protesting the Olympics peacefully, and there are people that are protesting it illegally and violently…” I guess we are supposed to associate a university prof with the protection of the right to protest, so if he condemns these “culprits”, then they should be tasered and tossed in jail. The article goes on to list other politically motivated property crimes, including the Squamish Five, “an offshoot of Vancouver’s punk scene, began with petty vandalism . Members then bombed a power station, military parts factory and porn video shops…” I didn’t realize there was such a slippery slope of crime. I saw some graffiti in the men’s washroom in the Scarfe building. I hope it doesn’t escalate to suicide bombers in the library.
The second article: Two cars were bombed, one in Toronto and one in Vancouver, and friendsofgrassynarrows.com claimed responsibility, in protest of the Olympics. The article stated that there was no actually evidence that the group committed the crime. It also noted that the unknown author on the website misspelled a couple of names. They must be stupid if they don’t like the Olympics.
 
I watched my girlfriend experience her guilty pleasure with a bunch of strangers.  24 of the 52 commuters on our Skytrain car were reading the 24 Hour paper.

 

as I was watching CNN’s coverage of the 2008 presidential campaign, I kept thinking about the quote in Donald Macedo’s Deconstructing the Corporate Media/Government Nexus that “the propaganda apparatus makes the “bewildered herd” believe that they are active participants in the democratic process and not merely “spectators.”" CNN certainly tries hard to make the coverage appear interactive, but this still comes across as superficial. ‘expert’ analyst Bill Schneider tells the viewer about the opinion poll breakdown for each candidate: what percent of White males support Obama, what percent of Latino women support McCain, what percent of married couples in the military support Obama, what percent of Starbuck’s coffee drinkers support either candiadte ad nauseum…… the numbers make it appear that everyone’s ‘voice’ is being accounted for, but i wonder what effect or relevance any of these figures have on the actual outcome of the election. it would be more interesting to have a CNN analyst break down the campaign donations from major corporations and interest groups so that Americans can get a real sense of who is supporting whom and why. of course, this is not likely to happen, at least not in primetime. Neither CNN nor any of the other major networks covering the election would dare ‘distrub’ middle America with the shocking truth that this election, just as the previous ones, is being bankrolled and I would argue largely decided by the NRA, Big Business, the Christian Right, Planned Parenthood, and a number of other special interest groups. couched in these terms, it would seem that we are merely “speactators” in this election process, passively waiting for the latest poll data, or gossip about either candidate. Yet, CNN still tells us that we, especially those peole residing in the so-called ’swing states,’ are the ones deciding the election. As long as we (Americans) continue to delude ourselves that the present election process is democratic, CNN and the networks which cover the election will happily oblige and continue to spoon feed us ‘manufactured democarcy:’ opinion polls, staged interviews, photo ops, and pep rallies etc.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

tags for media literacy...aftermath of ubc class 1